IIT Kharagpur director reprimanded by the court, court angry for not taking action on ragging

The body of Faizan Ahmed, a student of mechanical engineering at IIT Kharagpur, was found in the institute’s hostel. The police had said that Faizan had committed suicide.

IIT Kharagpur

Image Credit source: PTI

The Calcutta High Court on Thursday reprimanded the director of Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kharagpur for not taking action on the complaint of ragging. Actually, IIT Kharagpur In October, a complaint of ragging was registered at the institute before the body of 23-year-old student Faizan Ahmed was found. However, the director was reprimanded for not taking action even after receiving the complaint of ragging. Hearing is going on in the Calcutta High Court in the case of student’s death.

In February, 23-year-old Faizan Ahmed, a resident of Assam’s Tinsukia district, complained of ragging. But during that time proper action was not taken on ragging. At the same time, in October, the student’s body was found in a rotten condition in the hostel of the institute. The court had sought an action taken report on the complaint of ragging in IIT Kharagpur. At the same time, the court was very angry because of nothing being clear in the report. Now the director has been called for the next hearing to be held on 20 December.

What did the court say during the hearing?

During the hearing, the court said, the court has found that none of the above incidents have been mentioned in the report by the director. The Director’s report appears to be completely confusing. This is not a report covering issues from anywhere.

The court asked the counsel appearing for IIT Kharagpur, ‘Have you told what action has been taken in the report? Why is the director giving lectures here? We have asked your client to give the names of the students (ragging). The court asked you to name the students involved (in ragging). What have you done?’

On this question, the lawyer told the court, ‘We have not been able to identify the students.’ The bench hearing this got agitated and said, ‘What is going on here? Your client is playing along with the court. The director will be present in the next hearing.

The court said, ‘In the next hearing, ask the director to be present in the court. He is giving lectures, but he cannot trace the names or addresses of the students. What kind of director is he? It further said, ‘If IIT had acted in February, this situation would not have happened.’

read this also



What is the matter?

On October 14, the body of Faizan Ahmed, a third year mechanical student, was found in the hostel of IIT Kharagpur. The police claimed that Faizan died by suicide. However, the family of the deceased student alleged that he was forced to do so due to ragging. IIT Kharagpur Management did not act on his complaints. The family said that this is completely a case of murder.